Legal Opinion

Harsco Corp. v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1999No. 1997-2006Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 382.] HARSCO CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. TRACY, TAX COMMR., APPELLEE. [Cite as Harsco Corp. v. Tracy,

1999-Ohio-396.] Taxation—Franchise tax—Term “capital gain” as used in R.C. 5733.051(C) and (D) includes recaptured depreciation income attributable to the sale of Ohio assets. (No. 97-2006—Submitted January 12, 1999—Decided May 5, 1999.) APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 95-P-595. __________________ {¶ 1} In 1989 Harsco Corporation sold substantially all the assets of its Astro Division based in Wooster, Ohio.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. BairSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Borden, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Harsco Corp. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API