Legal Opinion

Cieniewicz v. Sliwka

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided June 11, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

Concerning the doctrine of bona fide purchaser for a valuable consideration and without notice, Pomeroy in Section 754 of his Treatise on Equity Jurisprudence (4th Ed.) states two general rules as settled since an early day. These are, first, “that if a second purchaser for value and without notice purchases from a first purchaser who is charged with notice, he thereby becomes a bona fide purchaser, and is entitled to protection;” and second, “that if a second purchaser with notice acquires title from a first purchaser who was without notice, and bona fide, he succeeds to all…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dick v. DoughtenCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1827

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blair v. F. H. Smith Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1931
  2. Bathla v. 913 Mkt., LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  3. Marsh v. MarshCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1970
  4. Bathla v. 913 Market, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  5. Birbeck v. American Toll Bridge Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API