Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Marsh

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided January 6, 1970PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHORT, Vice Chancellor:

Plaintiff, Theresa B. Marsh (Theresa) seeks an order against defendant Franklin H. Marsh (Franklin) for separate maintenance for herself and the two minor children of the parties. She also seeks to impress a trust in her favor on a parcel of real estate known as No. 2 Bellamy Drive, Whitehall, New Castle, Delaware, titled in the name of defendants Franklin W. Marsh (Wayne) and Mary E. Marsh (Mary), his wife. This is the decision after final hearing.

Theresa and Franklin were married in August 1964. At that time each had minor children by prior marriages, Theresa having…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Greenly v. GreenlyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1946
  2. Marvel v. OrtlipCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1866
  3. Williams v. WesselsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. Flitcraft v. Commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  5. Hanby v. HanbySupreme Court of Delaware · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. R. T. G. v. G. K. G.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  2. Bathla v. 913 Mkt., LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  3. Schmeusser v. SchmeusserSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  4. Lawyers Title Insurance v. Wolhar & Gill, P.A.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  5. Bathla v. 913 Market, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API