Legal Opinion

Shivers v. Stovall

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 22, 1934No. 11820PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted by appellants, E. M. Shivers and W. L. Garland, against ap-pellees, the commissioners’ court of Van Zandt county, the county judge, the county treasurer, and the county auditor, to review an order of said1 court, distributing the road and bridge fund of said county, and to enjoin appellees from carrying out such order. A general demurrer was sustained to appellants’ petition, and the suit was dismissed when appellants declined to amend. The appeal is duly perfected to this court.

When a general demurrer is sustained to a petition, the facts alleged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haverbekken v. Hale, County JudgeTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Oden v. BarbeeTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Kirby v. Transcontinental Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stovall v. ShiversTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Stockwell v. ParrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Garland v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Stovall v. ShiversTexas Commission of Appeals · 1937
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API