Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Abilene & S. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 2, 1925No. 4330PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

Appellant railway company appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia denying a writ of mandamus against appellee, Interstate Commerce Commission, to require it to “ascertain the facts and to perform the duties required of it by section 204 of the Transportation Act of 1920 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10Q71%bbb), and specifically to ascertain the amount of the deficit in its railway operating income for the period from January 1, 1918, to July 1, 1918, during which the relator operated its own railroad or system of transportation,…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lawrence D. Coleman v. The Honorable Arthur L. Burnett, United States Magistrate for the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Ry. Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Reichelderfer v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
  4. United States ex rel. Cripple Creek & Colorado Springs R. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
  5. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API