Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Cripple Creek & Colorado Springs R. v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 1, 1926No. 4357PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

Appellant, Cripple Creek & Colorado Springs Railroad Company, hereafter for convenience referred to as relator, brought a suit in mandamus in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia to compel the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellee herein, and hereafter referred to as the Commission, to issue to relator a certificate showing the amount payable to it, under section 204 of the Transportation Act of 1920. 41 Stat. 460 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10071í4bbb). The Commission answered, to which relator joined issue. On hearing, the court dismissed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. United States ex rel. Abilene & S. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Ry. Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. United States Ex Rel. Maine Potato Growers & Shippers Ass'n v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  3. United States ex rel. Delaware & Hudson R. Corp. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
  4. Reitz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  5. Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States ex rel. Arcata & Mad River RailroadCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API