Legal Opinion
Adams v. University of Washington
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 3, 1986No. 52154-9PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
Susan Adams, Candice Barker, Rita Wall, and Elisa Matriz brought an action against the University of Washington alleging that the University had violated RCW 49.12.175 by paying them less money in wages and benefits than it provided for men doing similar work in the composing room of the University's Department of Printing. This action and a later identical action brought by Sheila Scott were consolidated for trial. The trial court found no violation of RCW 49.12.175 and dismissed all claims. Adams, Barker, Wall, Matriz, and Scott appealed. We affirm.
Appellants are past or present employees…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- County of Washington v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Davis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1969
- 30 Fair empl.prac.cas. 57, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,123 Lola Kouba, A/K/A Lola Hogan, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, in Intervention-Appellee v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- King County v. Taxpayers of King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Clean v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- CLEAN v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Dragt v. Dragt/DeTray, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.