Legal Opinion

Peninsula Motor Co. v. Daggett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1923No. 17900Published

1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.

— Appellant instituted this action against respondent for the recovery of $450 and interest, upon a promissory note executed by respondent. The execution and delivery of the note is admitted. Respondent alleges, in his affirmative defense, that the note was given for the purchase of a Fordson tractor, pulleys, plows, tractor rims and belt, upon the oral representation that the tractor would pull two fourteen inch plows or one seven foot tan*276dem disk harrow, in soñ and upon ground such as respondent’s land, and

‘1 That said tractor would be satisfactory to him and would satisfactorily do the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eilers Music House v. Oriental Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Long v. Five-Hundred Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Hoyt v. Hainsworth Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Warren v. W. W. Sheane Auto Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. T. W. Little Co. v. FynbohWashington Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API