Peninsula Motor Co. v. Daggett
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.
— Appellant instituted this action against respondent for the recovery of $450 and interest, upon a promissory note executed by respondent. The execution and delivery of the note is admitted. Respondent alleges, in his affirmative defense, that the note was given for the purchase of a Fordson tractor, pulleys, plows, tractor rims and belt, upon the oral representation that the tractor would pull two fourteen inch plows or one seven foot tan*276dem disk harrow, in soñ and upon ground such as respondent’s land, and
‘1 That said tractor would be satisfactory to him and would satisfactorily do the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eilers Music House v. Oriental Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Long v. Five-Hundred Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
- Hoyt v. Hainsworth Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Warren v. W. W. Sheane Auto Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
- T. W. Little Co. v. FynbohWashington Supreme Court · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.