Legal Opinion

Spindle v. Sisters of Providence in Washington

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2002No. S-10169PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Dr. David K. Spindle appeals from the decision of the superior court granting summary judgment to Drs. Louis Kralick and John C. Godersky as well as their business Anchorage Neurosurgical Associates, Inc. and Sisters of Mercy Providence Hospital, Inc. on Dr. Spindle’s claims arising from his failure to obtain privileges at Providence Hospital. Because the superior court correctly found that Dr. Spindle’s failure to finish his application for privileges at the hospital rendered his antitrust and tort claims premature and thus not actionable, we affirm…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. James G.P. Collins v. Associated Pathologists, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Doctor Robert Sosa v. Board of Managers of the Val Verde Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Eidelson v. ArcherAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Evers v. Edward Hospital Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sadler v. Dimensions Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Witt v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Matanuska Electric Ass'n v. Chugach Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Hammond v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Alaska Trustee, LLC v. BachmeierAlaska Supreme Court · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API