Legal Opinion

State v. Fasteen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2007No. 20070046PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Scott Fasteen appealed from a criminal judgment entered upon his conditional plea of guilty to driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of N.D.C.C. § 39-08-01. We affirm, concluding the district court did not err in denying Fasteen’s suppression motion, because there was sufficient competent evidence to establish the arresting officer had a reasonable and articulable suspicion Fasteen had violated the law to justify a valid investigative stop.

I

[¶ 2] On November 5, 2006, a law enforcement officer patrolling on Highway 1804 clocked a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Amerada Hess Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Tax CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Zimmerman v. North Dakota Department of Transportation DirectorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Wolf v. Estate of SerightNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. LohNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Brewer v. ZieglerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Divide County Sheriff's Department ex rel. Throntveit v. M.W.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. R.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. PW Enterprises, Inc. v. State of North DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API