Legal Opinion

Jackson v. City of Santa Monica

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 22, 1936No. Civ. 10037PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHINN, J., pro tem.

In this case the opinion heretofore filed was -recalled and a rehearing was ordered by the court of its own motion for the consideration of questions of law which were not presented in the briefs or decided by the court, but which were nevertheless presented by the record. They are questions which must necessarily arise frequently and which, for reasons which will appear, we believe should be considered by the court at this time.

Plaintiff was injured while a passenger in a motor bus belonging to the City of Santa Monica and being operated by its employee Dawes. This action,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Doeg v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Brunson v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Southern Service Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Powers Farms, Inc. v. Consolidated Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Raynor v. City of ArcataCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API