Legal Opinion

State v. LaFreniere

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1992No. S-91-690PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

Pursuant to verdict, the defendant-appellant, Michael LaFreniere, was adjudged guilty of theft by receiving stolen property, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-517 (Reissue 1989). He assigns but one error, the district court’s determination that the evidence is sufficient to support the conviction. The record sustains the assignment, and we thus reverse and remand with direction that the information be dismissed.

The charge stems from the State’s claim that on October 17, 1990, LaFreniere sold approximately 720 pounds of uninsulated copper wire, owned by Union Pacific Railroad, with the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Pettus v. S TateMississippi Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State v. DawsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hancock v. State Ex Rel. State Real Estate CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. DouglasNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. DeanNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. PierceNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. CovarrubiasNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. ChambersNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. SkalbergNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API