Legal Opinion

State v. Skalberg

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1995No. S-93-592PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

We granted the State’s petition for further review of the decision of the Nebraska Court of Appeals which reversed the judgment of the Knox County District Court and remanded the *151cause to the district court with directions that the case against Todd Skalberg be dismissed because the circumstantial evidence presented was insufficient to prove Skalberg’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

Regarding a question of law, an appellate court has an obligation to reach a conclusion independent of that of the trial court in a judgment under review. State v. Roche, Inc., 246 Neb. 568, 520…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. DeanNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. SextonNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. Roche, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. CovarrubiasNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. PierceNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. SoukharithNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. OlbrichtNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. StackNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. ConklinNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API