Legal Opinion

Woodward v. Daniels

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 3, 1925No. 74PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

The plantiff proceeded in this case by writ of scire facias which is the usual and customary method of procedure. Register v. Layman et al., 5 Harr. 349; Biggs v. Rickards et al., 3 Harr. 283; Wooley on Del. Practice, §§1309, 1351. The defendant did not deny that under ordinary circumstances both plaintiff and defendant in a suit must be fully identified on the record; nor did he deny that if T. L. Woodward and the plaintiff were one and the same person that it was the duty of the said Woodward to bring suit by his Christian and surname,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Malsberger v. ParsonsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1910
  2. Bowie v. NealeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  3. Trustees of Mutual Loan Ass'n v. TyreSuperior Court of Delaware · 1911
  4. Dickerson v. KelleySuperior Court of Delaware · 1900
  5. Taylor v. TaylorSuperior Court of Delaware · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Woods v. SpoturnoSuperior Court of Delaware · 1936
  2. Calhoun v. F. G. Elliott Hdw. Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API