Legal Opinion

Calhoun v. F. G. Elliott Hdw. Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 5, 1931No. 4PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

Under the old common-law rule, in the absence of some pleading and proof to the contrary, every person was presumed to have a Christian or given name in addition to his family or surname, and generally speaking was not properly identified unless described thereby. 45 C. J. 368; Gatty v. Field, 9 Q. B. 431, 115 Eng. Rep. 1337; Holman v. Walden, 91 Eng. Rep. 6; Gardner v. State, 4 Ind. 632.

This rule applied to both civil and criminal proceedings and under it a party to an action was not properly identified if instead of setting out his…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Monroe Cattle Co. v. BeckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Breedlove & Robeson v. Nicolet & SiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  3. Gerrish v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  4. Gardner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Tweedy v. JarvisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Money v. HartSuperior Court of Delaware · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API