Calhoun v. F. G. Elliott Hdw. Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Harrington, J.,
delivering the opinion of the court:
Under the old common-law rule, in the absence of some pleading and proof to the contrary, every person was presumed to have a Christian or given name in addition to his family or surname, and generally speaking was not properly identified unless described thereby. 45 C. J. 368; Gatty v. Field, 9 Q. B. 431, 115 Eng. Rep. 1337; Holman v. Walden, 91 Eng. Rep. 6; Gardner v. State, 4 Ind. 632.
This rule applied to both civil and criminal proceedings and under it a party to an action was not properly identified if instead of setting out his…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Monroe Cattle Co. v. BeckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Breedlove & Robeson v. Nicolet & SiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Gerrish v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Gardner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
- Tweedy v. JarvisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Money v. HartSuperior Court of Delaware · 1932