Legal Opinion

State v. Kemp/Haworth

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 22, 1992No. 90CR0238FE; CA A65542 (Control); 90CR0243FE; CA A65724PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Defendants 1 were arrested for possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine. ORS 475.992(4). They moved to suppress evidence of the crime, arguing that the discovery and seizure of the methamphetamine resulted from an illegal search and seizure. The trial court granted the motion, and the state appeals. We reverse and remand.

At approximately 8 p.m. on October 20, 1989, Oregon State Police Trooper Markee was driving on an 1-5 on-ramp in Douglas County, when he saw a compact car travel-ling parallel to him on 1-5. Markee noticed that the dome light was on in the car and that the front…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. AinsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. HerbertOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. NevelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. State v. CramptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. State v. KrauseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. BlountCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API