State v. Nevel
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*272ROSSMAN, P. J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for possession, manufacture and delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1)(a), (4)(b). He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress statements obtained after he was stopped and evidence was seized from his person and vehicle. He also claims that the court erred in denying his motion for judgments of acquittal on the manufacture and delivery charges. We affirm.
At approximately midnight, Officer Larson was dispatched to the scene of an automobile accident in Portland. The report of the accident said that a woman…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. WerowinskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. Heise-FayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.