Legal Opinion

Gonzalez v. City of Harlingen

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 29, 1991No. 13-90-216-CVPublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

This is a summary judgment case. Appellants, Alfonso and Yolanda Gonzalez sued appellees, the City of Harlingen and Jesus Cisneros for violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act (DTPA). 1 The trial court granted summary judgments favorable to appel-lees. The Gonzalezes appeal by five points of error. We affirm.

The Gonzalezes, in their “PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION,” alleged that they contacted the City of Harlingen Rehabilitation Program (City) to see if they qualified for low interest loans to repair their home. The Gonzalezes spoke…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Woods v. William M. Mercer, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Wilcox v. St. Mary's University of San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. RRR Farms, Ltd. v. American Horse Protection Ass'n, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  2. Rios v. Texas Commerce Bancshares, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
  3. Gorges Foodservice, Inc. v. Huerta, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
  4. Pena v. State Farm Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
  5. May v. Nacogdoches Memorial Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2001

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API