Pena v. State Farm Lloyds
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HINOJOSA, Justice.
This is an appeal from the grant of a summary judgment in favor of appellee, State Farm Lloyds, an insurance company. Appellants, Ernest Peña and Yvonne Peña, raise five points of error contending the trial court erred: (1) in granting State Farm’s motion for summary judgment, (2) in finding that their tort and policy benefit claims were barred by limitations, (3) in deciding that State Farm had a reasonable basis for denying their claims, (4) in determining that State Farm did not violate any provisions of the insurance code or engage in deceptive trade practices,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
- Casso v. BrandTexas Supreme Court · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Britton v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
- Williams v. Bank One, Texas, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
- McClure v. Attebury, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
- Wortham v. Dow Chemical Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Jackson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.