Legal Opinion

Pena v. State Farm Lloyds

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided December 17, 1998No. 13-97-150-CVPublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HINOJOSA, Justice.

This is an appeal from the grant of a summary judgment in favor of appellee, State Farm Lloyds, an insurance company. Appellants, Ernest Peña and Yvonne Peña, raise five points of error contending the trial court erred: (1) in granting State Farm’s motion for summary judgment, (2) in finding that their tort and policy benefit claims were barred by limitations, (3) in deciding that State Farm had a reasonable basis for denying their claims, (4) in determining that State Farm did not violate any provisions of the insurance code or engage in deceptive trade practices,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Casso v. BrandTexas Supreme Court · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Britton v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  2. Williams v. Bank One, Texas, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
  3. McClure v. Attebury, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
  4. Wortham v. Dow Chemical Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  5. Jackson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API