Legal Opinion
Pultz v. Novastar Mortgage, Inc. (In Re Pultz)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 13, 2008No. 19-10945PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
JAMES F. SCHNEIDER, United States Bankruptcy Judge.
In the instant adversary proceeding, a debtor seeks damages against a mortgage lender for violations of the automatic stay. The matters before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment, as well as the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s second amended complaint. 1 For the reasons stated, the motion of the plaintiff for summary judgment [P. 14]…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adams v. BainCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Bosiger v. US Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cousins v. CitiFinancial Mortgage Co. (In Re Cousins)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
- Colorado East Bank & Trust v. McCarthy (In Re McCarthy)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2009
- Zotow v. Johnson (In Re Zotow)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Schatz v. Chase Home Finance (In Re Schatz)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Helman v. Udren Law Offices, P.C.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.