People v. Green
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from two convictions of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, defendant raises a number of contentions. None requires reversal. The officer’s testimony about her mugshot identification of defendant did not constitute reversible error. No CPL 710.30 notice was required as the photo identification was merely confirmatory (see, People v Suren, 131 AD2d 896, 897, lv denied 70 NY2d 804; People v Kearn, 118 AD2d 871, 872-873). Further, the testimony concerning the photo identification did not constitute improper…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. CasertaNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- People v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. KearnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. SurenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. GambleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. MoyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. DemottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. McIntyreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. CasadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.