Legal Opinion

People v. Caserta

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1966PublishedCited by 137 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.

The principal basis urged for reversal is the receipt in evidence over objection of testimony by Police Officer Maimone to his previous identification of the defendant from photographs, contrary to the rulings in People v. Cioffi (1 N Y 2d 70, 73) and People v. Hagedorny (272 App. Div. 830), *21and permitting, also over objection, Detective Lo Curto to bolster his identification by testifying that he observed Officer Maimone identify appellant contrary to the rulings in People v. Trowbridge (305 N. Y. 471); People v. Cioffi (supra); People v. Herrmann (9 N Y 2d 665). Prior to the adoption of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. TrowbridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Ferris v. . SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. People v. . Jung HingNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. People v. SingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Crawford v. NilanNew York Court of Appeals · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by137 opinions

  1. People v. MassieNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. McCleanNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. MobleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. PleasantNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 2013

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API