Legal Opinion

White v. Rosenstein

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 1933No. Docket No. 8031PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

In this suit it was sought to recover from a notary public or the notary’s bondsman certain damages resulting from a transaction regarding real estate and an encumbrance thereon to secure the loan, in which the notary took an acknowledgment without knowing that the acknowledger was the person she claimed to be. The case was tried by the court without a jury and judgment was awarded plaintiffs. A motion was subsequently made by defendants under section 663 of the Code of Civil Procedure “for an order vacating and setting aside said judgment in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Forsythe v. Los Angeles Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Commercial Bank of Madera v. RedfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Semple v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Wood v. PendolaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brooks v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Lamanet v. LamanetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. White v. RosensteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API