Legal Opinion

White v. Rosenstein

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1935No. Civ. 9818PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs-respondents made and entered pursuant to our order after a former appeal. Howard White, one of the respondents, is deceased, and no substitution has been made. The appeal of National Surety Company has been dismissed, leaving Harriett B. Rosenstein as the sole appellant.

The basic facts from which the cause of action arose are as follows: On the sixteenth day of March, 1928, Anna B. Dorn owned certain real property situated in Los Angeles County, and on that day one Ora Nye, falsely representing herself to be Anna B. Dorn, appeared…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Tally v. GanahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Follette v. Pacific Light & Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Hunter v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Smith v. YuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Pell v. McElroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Manig v. BachmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Hansen v. G & G TRUCKING CO.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Jordan v. O'ConnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. McDonald v. PlumbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Yavor v. City One LocksmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API