Legal Opinion

Wolfe v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1981No. WD 31209PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANFORD, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying post-conviction relief pursuant to a Rule 27.26 motion. The judgment is affirmed.

Appellant was convicted for burglary, second degree, and stealing. He was sentenced to concurrent sentences of ten and five years. The judgment was affirmed, see State v. Wolfe, 570 S.W.2d 694 (Mo.App.1978). Appellant filed a pro se 27.26 motion, which was amended after appointment of counsel. An evidentiary hearing was held following which the trial court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law. The rule in Fields v. State, 572 S.W.2d 477…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  2. Shaw v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Decker v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. State v. SettleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. GearyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API