Chavez v. City of Albuquerque
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINIÓN
WECHSLER, Judge.
1. Plaintiff Peter Chavez appeals the grant of summary judgment to the City of Albuquerque (the City) based on claim preclusion, commonly known as res judicata. We must determine the preclusive effect of Plaintiffs administrative grievance proceeding on his subsequent district court action. In so doing, we also consider whether the City’s personnel board (personnel board) would have had authority to consider the district court claims had Plaintiff raised those claims during the administrative proceeding. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Facts and Prior Proceedings
2.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Roth v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Shovelin v. Central New Mexico Electric Cooperative, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Morningstar Water Users Ass'n v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Cummings v. X-Ray Associates of New Mexico, P. C.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Lymon v. Aramark Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Glover v. GartmanDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- Barreras v. State Corrections DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Gallegos v. Bernalillo County Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
- Lion's Gate Water v. D'ANTONIONew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.