Legal Opinion

Thueson v. U-Haul International, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 2006No. A109509PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRUINIERS, J. *

Following trial by the court, judgment was entered against plaintiff and appellant David O. Thueson and in favor of defendants and respondents U-Haul Co. of California (doing business as U-Haul Co. of San Francisco) (U-Haul), on appellant’s claims that his dealership agreement was improperly terminated. His claims rested on the premise that the dealership agreement was a franchise, subject to the provisions of the California Franchise Investment Law (CFIL) (Corp. Code, § 31000 et seq.), and the California Franchise Relations Act (CFRA) (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 20000 et…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Howard v. Owens CorningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Finnie v. Town of TiburonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. 1-800-GOT JUNK? LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Roberts v. C.R. England, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
  3. Century 21 Real Estate LLC v. All Professional Realty, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2012
  4. Absolute USA, Inc. v. Harman Professional, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2023
  5. Jack In The Box Inc. v. San-Tex Restaurants, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API