Legal Opinion

State v. Shannon

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 19, 1929No. 27,285PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

The defendant appeals from an order of the district court of Freeborn county denying his motion for a new trial.

Defendant was convicted of maintaining a liquor nuisance in the city of Albert Lea. Errors assigned raise two points: (1) That the indictment states no public offense and hence objections to the admission of any evidence should have been sustained; (2) that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence and is contrary thereto. Defendant properly protected his contentions by objections, exceptions, motions and requests.

The charging part of the indictment is as follows:

“Milton Shannon…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. SharpSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Commonwealth v. KimballMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. State ex rel. O'Malley v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  4. State v. BloomdaleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State v. StockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SuessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. State v. EwaldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API