State v. Bloomdale
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of.Sargent county; AUen, J. Defendant was convicted of keeping and maintaining a common-nuisance, as of a second offénse, and appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Morgan, Ch. J.
The defendant was convicted of keeping and maintaining a common nuisance contrary to the provisions of chap. 65 of the Revised Codes of 1905, and was sentenced to serve one year in the-penitentiary, under the verdict of the jury finding him guilty of the offense charged in the information, which was alleged therein to be a. second offense. The first assignment of error by the appellant is that the information does not set forth facts sufficient to constitute a former-conviction of this offense. The allegations of the information are as follows, so far as material on this appeal:…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. RozumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
- State v. MarkusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1887
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1855
- Dull v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1847
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. WebbNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. RubleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. MoraNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. GielenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. ShannonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.