Legal Opinion

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2003PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order of Onondaga County Court (Aloi, J.), entered May 1, 2001, which determined that defendant is a level three risk under the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk under the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Defendant contends that his due process and equal protection rights were violated because the presumptive overrides applied by the New York State…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. David W.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. IannelliNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. RuzNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. New York State Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders v. RansomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. GirupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. People v. SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. People v. HeichelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API