Legal Opinion

Lady Ann's Oddities, Inc. v. MacY

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided July 23, 1981No. CIV-81-500-BT, CIV-81-501-BT and CIV-81-504-BTPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRETT, District Judge.

On April 13, 1981 the Governor of Oklahoma signed into law S.B. 114 which proscribes the use, possession, manufacture or delivery [transfer or sale] of “drug paraphernalia.” The same day, plaintiff Lady Ann’s Oddities, Inc., et al., brought this action for a Temporary Restraining Order enjoining enforcement of the Act and sought a judgment declaring the Act unconstitutional. Shortly thereafter, two identical suits were filed requesting the same relief. By stipulation of the parties, all three cases have been consolidated into the present action. 1

Plainti…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. The TOWN TOBACCONIST v. KimmelmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  3. Bardney v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API