Bardney v. United States

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge:

Before the court is R. Eugene Pincham’s (“Pincham”) motion to vacate three orders entered by the court. For the reasons which ensue, the motion is denied.

I

Regrettably, the instant motion forces the court to revisit the history of recalcitrance exhibited by Pincham. On August 14, 1996, Pincham filed on behalf of Victor M. Bardney a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct the conviction and sentence imposed by the court. Pincham filed the motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Fifteen days later, on August 29, 1996, the court, sua sponte, ordered Pincham to…