Smith v. James
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Noble Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
The appellees assert title to real estate, and ask to have their title quieted.
We extract from the special finding these material facts: John James was the owner of the real estate in controversy, on the 16th day of August, 1884, and on that day conveyed it to his son, the appellee Leander James. The finding states *132that the grantor had entertained the purpose “ to give the land to his son for some .years prior to the execution of the deed conveying the real estate. In other parts of the finding the court speaks of the “ execution of the deed.” The only direct statement upon the subject of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Staser v. HoganIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Perkins v. HaywardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Shugart v. MilesIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Nicholson v. CombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Naugle v. State ex rel. BurtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Wolverton v. WolvertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- State Ex Rel. Johnson v. BoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
- Taylor v. CanadayIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Indiana Trust Co. v. ByramIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.