Legal Opinion · Dissent

Baptist Health Med. Sys. v. Rutledge

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 17, 2016No. CV-15-616Published

1DissentRhonda K. Wood, Justice

This case presents a five, justiciable controversy, and I would reach the merits of the hospitals’ appeal. One purpose of a declaratory-judgment action is for a party to seek a declaration of its rights before waiting |sto be sued. These actions eliminate legal uncertainty and promote efficiency. But under the majority’s view, the hospitals must wait to be sued before they can know their rights under the Peer Review Fairness Act. This result subverts the purpose of the declaratory-judgment action,' something that for all practical purposes the hospitals cannot, enjoy. I respectfully dissent.

Th…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Jegley v. PicadoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. UHS of Arkansas, Inc. v. City of SherwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. McDonald v. BowenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  5. McGhee v. Arkansas State Board of Collection AgenciesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API