Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Bowen

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 28, 1971No. 5-5643PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The city of Little Rock, with some aid from a group of private citizens, proposes to submit for approval at a special election a $9,500,000 bond issue under the authority of Constitutional Amendment No. 18 and its implementing statute, Act 206 of 1963, compiled as Ark. Stat. Ann., Title 19, Ch. 31 (Repl. 1968). This is a taxpayer’s suit brought by the appellant to enjoin the city directors from proceeding with the election and to obtain a declaratory judgment holding the implementing act to be unconstitutional and declaring some or all of the purposes of the bond…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Westbrook v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. Rathjen v. Reorganized School District R-IISupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. Bailey, Lieutenant-Governor v. AbingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  4. State ex rel. Getchell v. O'connorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Myhand v. ErwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. McElroy v. GrishamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Brewer v. FergusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Baker Refrigeration Systems, Inc. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. McCuen v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  5. McKinney v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API