Legal Opinion

United Leasing & Financial Services, Inc. v. R. F. Optical, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 23, 1981No. 80-1559PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCannon, J.

This is an action to recover damages for breach of two business equipment leases . Defendants challenge the enforceability of and calculation of damages under the default clause of the leases. The trial court enforced the agreements and awarded the plaintiff accrued and future rents due to the end of the lease term, less the sales price of the equipment and rents paid by the purchaser, together with interest and attorney fees. We affirm the trial court’s decision to enforce the agree ment, however, we conclude that the accelerated rents must be discounted to present value.

The default clause…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Pleasure Time, Inc. v. KussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Mayfield v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Southwest Park Outpatient Surgery, Ltd. v. Chandler Leasing DivisionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wassenaar v. PanosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Thorp Sales Corp. v. Gyuro Grading Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. W.L. Scott, Inc. v. Madras Aerotech, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Kedziora v. Citicorp National Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  5. Wolnak v. Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgeons of Central WisconsinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API