Legal Opinion

Mayfield v. Hicks

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 24, 1978No. 19540PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AKIN, Justice.

This is an appeal from an instructed verdict rendered against the guarantors of two equipment leases. Dave Hicks Company sued Four C Corporation, the primary obli-gor, for amounts due under the first equipment lease agreement and sued Mayfield, Hughes, O’Neal and Trimmier, the guarantors, on a guaranty of Four C Corporation’s obligations under this lease. Dave Hicks, individually, also sued Four C Corporation for the amounts due under a second equipment lease and sued the guarantors under the terms of a similar guaranty. Four C Corporation neither filed an answer nor…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Black Lake Pipe Line Co. v. Union Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Stewart v. BaseyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hanson Southwest Corp. v. Dal-Mac Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Davis v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  5. Schepps v. American District Telegraph Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. FPL Energy, LLC v. TXU Portfolio Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Menetti v. Chavers, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  3. Wiman v. Tomaszewicz, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
  4. Community Development Service, Inc. v. Replacement Parts Manufacturing, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  5. Durham v. Uvalde Rock Asphalt Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API