Legal Opinion
Nichimen Company v. MV Farland
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 29, 1971No. 65 Ad. 1278PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BONSAL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Nichimen Company, Inc., of New York, N. Y., instituted this action for cargo damage against the MV FAR-LAND, her owner A/S Vigra (“Vigra”), and the time charterer Seaboard Ship ping Co., Ltd. (“Seaboard”). The issues were tried before the court without a jury.
Plaintiff, a wholly owned subsidiary of Nichimen Co., Ltd., purchased 280 coils of steel from Nichimen Co., Ltd. (of Tokyo, Japan) by invoice dated December 15, 1964 and irrevocable letter of credit payable on presentation of clean on board bills of lading.
On August 8, 1963, Vigra, as owner of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Tobacco Co. v. The Katingo HadjipateraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- The Daido Line v. Thomas P. Gonzalez, CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Gans S. S. Line v. WilhelmsenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Mamiye Bros. v. Barber Steamship Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Demsey & Associates, Inc. v. S.S. Sea StarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nichimen Company, Inc. v. M. v. Farland, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and A/s Vigra, Defendants-Appellants-Appellees v. Seaboard Shipping Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Ohoud Establishment for Trade & Contracts v. Tri-State Contracting & Trading Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- In Re the Complaint of Tecomar S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Kane International Corp. v. MV Hellenic WaveDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Van Muching [Sic] & Co., Inc. v. M/V STAR MINDANAODistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985