Legal Opinion
Mamiye Bros. v. Barber Steamship Lines, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 5, 1965PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYATT, District Judge.
These are three admiralty suits in personam, consolidated for trial by a pre-trial order of Judge Sugarman filed April 3, 1963 (Rule 13 of Admiralty Rules of this Court). They are to recover for damage caused to cargo goods by high water which on September 12, 1960, flooded Pier 5 in Brooklyn where the goods were being held. The high water was associated with Hurricane Donna which passed New York Harbor on the date given. There is no dispute as to the fact of water damage nor as to the reason therefor.
After trial, the decision is that the libel in each of the three suits…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & StahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Johnson v. LutzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Clark v. BarnwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- The CaledoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Noritake Co., Inc. v. M/v Hellenic ChampionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Pan American World Airways, Inc., a Corporation v. California Stevedore and Ballast Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Demsey & Associates, Inc. v. S.S. Sea StarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Mamiye Bros. v. Barber Steamship Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Yates v. Bair Transport, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.