Legal Opinion

Sutton v. Peterson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1938No. 26776. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs to rescind a contract for the purchase of a quantity of standing timber and for damages.

The trial court found that the purchase was induced by false and fraudulent representations made by the defendants. Judgment was entered rescinding the contract and awarding the plaintiffs a money judgment for payment made on account of the purchase price, as well as for certain incidental expenses incurred by them. The defendants appeal.

The husbands will be referred to singly as respondent and appellant.

In March, 1936, the respondent’s attention was attracted to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Samson v. BealeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Stewart v. LarkinWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Griffith v. StrandWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Conta v. CorgiatWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Walsh v. BushellWashington Supreme Court · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ross v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Zastrow v. W. G. Platts, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Enrico v. OversonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  4. W. G. Platts, Inc. v. WendtWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Nestos v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API