Legal Opinion

Early v. Robinson

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 11, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.

This order must be reversed. The tenant has been dispossessed. In fact he did not defend. The subtenant claims to have made a new lease for the remainder of the term during which the tenant’s lease ran with one of the three tenants in common, landlords herein. The agreement for a"new lease is denied by the tenant in common who claims he never saw or talked with the subtenant on the subject. While the evidence was sufficient to warrant a finding by the court that the agreement was made, this does not avail the subtenant for the reason that such an agreement on the part of one tenant in common…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Valentine v. . HealeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Albert v. SchrankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. De Lancey v. RobbinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kassover v. Gordon Family Associates, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1983
  2. Pugliese v. Saburro, New York County Courts1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API