Legal Opinion

De Lancey v. Robbin

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 24, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District. Two actions, one by Grace De Lancey and others against Frederick Robbin, and the other by Emma A. Heylman and others against Lillian O. Cummings and others. From judgments for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.

On March 14, 1906, Harriet Heylman leased certain property to Frederick Robbin for a term of five years. Thereafter Robbin assigned to Cummings and Haramis, defendants herein, who assumed the covenant to pay rent; and Cummings subsequently assigned to Haramis. Harriet Heylman devised the property to Henry Heylman and the plaintiffs herein as tenants in common. Henry Heylman was appointed executor, and subsequent to his qualification as such, entered into an agreement, under seal, individually, on January *94710, 1908, with Haramis, whereby Haramis agreed to pay an increased rent and the water taxes…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kingsland v. RyckmanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1873

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Krost v. MoyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Early v. RobinsonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API