Albert v. Schrank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Greenbaum, J.:
The gravamen of the plaintiff’s cause of action is that he was employed by the defendants to procure the sale of premises known as 1237 Hoe avenue, borough of The Bronx, of which they were owners, for the sum of $100,000 upon certain stated terms; that at the time of the employment he was told by the defendant Schrank that the gross rentals of the premises aggregated upwards of $17,000; that he succeeded in finding purchasers ready, able and willing at that price and upon the terms fixed by the defendants; that plaintiff procured the purchasers upon the alleged representations…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Barson v. . MulliganNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Cosgriff v. . FossNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
3Cited by6 opinions
- Masick v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Greiner-Maltz Co. v. StevensNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- Schneider v. BrennerNew York Supreme Court · 1929
- Early v. RobinsonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1926
- In re the Accounting of CarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.