Gray v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BELSON, Associate Judge:
Appellant was convicted of one count of rape in violation of D.C.Code § 22-2801 (1981). On appeal, he contends that his conviction should be overturned because the trial court failed to instruct the jury, sua sponte, that it must reach unanimity with respect to the particular set of facts that constituted the rape. Finding no plain error in the court’s failure to give a special unanimity instruction, we affirm.
Appellant was indicted on two counts of rape and one count of sodomy, all relating to a set of events that occurred at about 10:00 on the evening of November…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- United States v. Franklin Delano GipsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Andres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Owens v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Quintano v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Parks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Gardner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.