Legal Opinion

Gardner v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1997No. 93-CF-654, 93-CF-1312 and 93-CF-1357PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

The three appellants appeal from their various convictions resulting from a gang rape of a young woman. After a jury trial, appellants Gardner and Walker were convicted of three counts of rape, 1 one count of sodomy, 2 and one count of assault with intent to commit sodomy. 3 Appellant Thomas was convicted of two counts of rape and one count of sodomy. 4 On appeal, all three appellants present two arguments: (1) that the trial court committed reversible error when it restricted defense counsel’s cross-examination of the victim, and (2) that the court erred when it…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Clayborne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Umanzor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Maddox v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Roberts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API