Legal Opinion
Hurst v. Dixon
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided May 20, 2004No. 03-669Published
1Opinion of the Court
182 S.W.3d 102 (2004)
357 Ark. 439
Carl S. HURST, Individually, and Carl S. Hurst, as an Employee and/or Agent of Miller Transporters, Inc., and Miller Transporters, Inc.
v.
Willie B. DIXON.
No. 03-669.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
May 20, 2004.
Howell, Trice, Hope & Files, P.A., by: Jason D. Files, Little Rock, for appellant.
Wilson Law Firm, P.A., by: E. Dion Wilson, Helena, for appellee.
ANNABELLE CLINTON IMBER, Justice.
Appellants Carl S. Hurst and Miller Transporters, Inc., appeal from a circuit court's order denying a setoff or credit under the Mississippi Insurance Guaranty Association Law…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Doe v. BaumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Douglas v. Adams Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Proios v. BokeirCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Lonigro v. LockettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Hurst v. DixonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.