Hurst v. Dixon
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.
Appellants Carl S. ustice. appeal from a circuit court’s order denying a setoff or credit under the Mississippi Insurance Guaranty Association Law (“MIGA”), codified at Miss. Code Ann. § 83-23-101 etseq. (1999), for sums paid to Appellee Willie Dixon by his own insurance carrier and by his employer’s workers’ compensation carrier. We accepted certification of this case from the Arkansas Court of Appeals as a matter of first impression regarding interpretation of MIGA. We find no error and affirm.
On January 3, 2002, Appellee Willie B. Dixon was traveling…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Doe v. BaumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Proios v. BokeirCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Lonigro v. LockettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Winter v. FA Richard & Associates, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bomar v. MoserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. BrileySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- ARK. DEPT. HEALTH & HUMAN SERV. v. BrileySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Dale v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
- Scott White v. Hunter OwenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.