Legal Opinion

Lonigro v. Lockett

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 3, 1993No. 1-92-0304PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Egan

The plaintiff, Nick Lonigro (Lonigro), sued the defendants, Penny-Cab Company (Penny Cab), George Lockett and James Benecke, to recover for personal injuries he sustained in an automobile collision. The jury found Benecke not liable and found that Penny Cab and Lockett were liable in the amount of $40,000. (We will refer to Penny Cab and Lockett collectively as Penny Cab.) The post-trial motion of Penny Cab for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or to reduce the judgment to $25,000 was stricken on the plaintiff’s motion. Penny Cab maintains that the court erred in striking the motion, that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Underground Contractors Ass'n v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Lucas v. Illinois Insurance Guaranty FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. People v. Capitol News, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Urban v. LohamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Herriford v. BoylesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hurst v. DixonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Modern Steel Treating Co. v. Liquid Carbonic Industrial/Medical Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  3. Hasemann v. WhiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Tralmer v. Soztneps, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. Bell v. SlezakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API