Legal Opinion

Meltzer v. Baltimore & O. R.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 1941No. 814PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

This is a suit to recover damages for injuries to 127 carloads of watermelons delivered by the defendant railroad company to the plaintiff, the consignee, at Philadelphia.

In the case of Meltzer v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, 29 F.Supp. 840, 842, 841 (herein referred to as the first Meltzer case, involving a number of shipments which had nothing to do with those in this case), this court ruled that it was proper to accept the plaintiff’s evidence of prices obtained by him, as prima facie evidence of his “full actual loss.” The con*392signee’s full actual loss…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meltzer v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Bronstein v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Santiago v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1973
  2. Texas and New Orleans Railroad Co. v. H. Rouw Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Utah Poultry & Farmers Cooperative v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1954
  4. Utah Poultry & Farmers Cooperative v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API