Legal Opinion

Meltzer v. Pennsylvania R.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1939No. 20346PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

This is a suit to recover damages for injury to thirty-five carloads of watermelons delivered by the defendant railroad company to the plaintiff, the consignee, at Philadelphia. The case was tried at the same term of court as Bronstein v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, D. C., 29 F.Supp. 837, in which an opinion has been filed this day. Upon the general question of liability, the issues were much the same, and the discussion of that point in the Bronstein case is fully applicable here and need not be repeated but may be referred to if need be.

In this case, I…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Bronstein v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Weirton Steel Co. v. Isbrandtsen-Moller Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. Conditioned Air Corp. v. Rock Island Motor Transit Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  3. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc. v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  4. F. J. McCarty Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1968
  5. Southern-Plaza Express, Inc. v. Neal Harville, Jr., and Joni Ruth Harville, D/B/A Harville Rose ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API